Uberbau_house residency

Sao Paulo, Brasil | 2021

Stage 1

In this first stage of the research, curatorial practice was approached from a sensory perspective, beginning with the development of a theoretical framework centered on perception as a multisensory, culturally mediated, and situated phenomenon. Drawing on authors such as David Le Breton, Paul Rodaway, and David Howes, the study explored the relationship between body, senses, and environment, questioning the hegemony of visuality in Western societies and recognizing alternative sensory epistemologies present in different cultures. The research establishes that the body is the measure of the world, and that the senses —both external and internal— are active tools of knowledge, capable of generating a symbolic possession of the environment and constructing meaningful experiences in dialogue with their context.

As a result of this conceptual framework, Project C was developed as a spatial–perceptual measurement device designed to identify, map, and activate the sensory potential of a space, whether public, private, or intimate. Its structure is organized into measurement wheels that record contextual, environmental, social, architectural, and perceptual variables, linking them to sensory thresholds. This device functions as a diagnostic tool prior to intervention, a guide for designing curatorial experiences, a repository of sensory data, and a platform for public engagement.

Together, these elements lay the groundwork for a curatorial approach that shifts the focus from the dominant visual regime to an expanded field of sensory experiences, fostering critical, inclusive, and relational practices. This first stage leaves as a legacy a conceptual and methodological framework that enables the arts to be addressed through the active interaction between body, artwork, space, and community.

Closing Remarks

At the conclusion of this stage of research, new questions emerged to guide future directions. One of the first was the need to delve deeper into the conceptual framework of sensory studies, recognizing that these may not need to be understood as isolated categories, but rather as an interdependent network of factors. A further point of reflection concerns the very nature of the developed device: is it truly a measurement tool, or rather a conceptual artifact that serves as a reminder of potential variables to consider when engaging with a space? From this perspective, Project C might be understood less as a precise instrument of quantification and more as a curatorial memory aid, one that highlights analytical axes whose exact measurement may, in many cases, be impractical.

Additionally, there remains an open field of exploration regarding curatorial practice itself, particularly in incorporating non-traditional approaches that could enrich the theoretical framework and reframe the role of curatorship within complex sensory contexts. These questions do not weaken the process undertaken; rather, they project it towards a more open, relational, and critical field of inquiry, where practice and theory continue to inform and expand upon one another.